_but-de-amar-team-2.jpg "But de AMAR - Team 2 from o amar valobasa mouli Video Screenshot Preview")
GalleryPlay Video:
(Note: The default playback of the video is HD VERSION. If your browser is buffering the video slowly, please play the REGULAR MP4 VERSION or Open The Video below for better experience. Thank you!)
⏲ Duration: 0:31
✓ Published: 21-Apr-2024
✓ Published: 21-Apr-2024
Share with your friends:
Whatsapp | Viber | Telegram | Line | SMS
Email | Twitter | Reddit | Tumblr | Pinterest
Related Videos
_but-de-amar-ferkous-team-2.webp "But de AMAR FERKOUS - Team 2 from o amar valobasa mouli")
_but-de-amar-ferkous-team-2.webp "But de AMAR FERKOUS - Team 2 from o amar valobasa mouli")
_reasons-for-the-us-rejecting-palestine-from-becoming-a-member-of-the-united-nations.webp "Palestine was again canceled from becoming a full member of the United Nations in a voting session by the United Nations Security Council on Thursday, April 18, 2024. Palestine was previously proposed to become a full member of the United Nations by Algeria.<br/><br/>Based on this proposal, the United Nations Security Council then held a vote, which was attended by China, France, Russia, Britain, and the United States, as well as 10 non-permanent members elected by the General Assembly for a two-year term. The current non-permanent members of the United Nations Security Council are Algeria, Ecuador, Guyana, Japan, Malta, Mozambique, South Korea, Sierra Leone, Slovenia, and Switzerland.<br/><br/>In the vote, 12 countries agreed, while Switzerland and the UK abstained. However, the United States used its veto power to reject the proposal for Palestine to become a permanent member of the United Nations. This rejection made the Security Council fail to recommend that the United Nations General Assembly hold a vote for all member states to allow Palestine to join as a full member. So what is the reason why the United States rejects Palestine's full membership in the United Nations?<br/><br/>United States Deputy Ambassador Robert Wood said the use of the veto power did not reflect rejection of a Palestinian state. However, the veto was given because he believed that recognition of a Palestinian state could only occur through direct negotiations between the two parties to the conflict, namely Palestine and Israel.<br/><br/>However, the United States expressed support for implementing a two-state solution that could result in a peace agreement.\")
⏲ 4:37 ✓ 23-Apr-2024
_but-de-amar-team-2.webp "But de AMAR - Team 2 from o amar valobasa mouli")
_but-de-amar-team-2.webp "But de AMAR - Team 2 from o amar valobasa mouli")
_but-de-amar-team-b.webp "But de Amar - Team B from o amar valobasa mouli")
_but-de-amar-team-b.webp "But de Amar - Team B from o amar valobasa mouli")
_but-de-amar-team-b.webp "But de Amar - Team B from o amar valobasa mouli")
_but-de-amar-ferkous-team-2.jpg)
_but-de-amar-ferkous-team-2.jpg)
_reasons-for-the-us-rejecting-palestine-from-becoming-a-member-of-the-united-nations.jpg)
_but-de-amar-team-2.jpg)
_but-de-amar-team-2.jpg)
_but-de-amar-team-b.jpg)
_but-de-amar-team-b.jpg)
_but-de-amar-team-b.jpg)
![[+]](/images/menu.gif){kind=small}